All Consuming


Jim Carson
Bellevue

Why I recommend this — 37 weeks ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

Cowen’s writing is conversational, as if he was making observations of life. (If my macroeconomics classes had been this way!) Dubner’s “Freakonomics” is more audacious (and recommended) while Landsburg’s “More Sex is Safer Sex” is interesting only as a thought experiment; see my review on it.

A recurring theme in the book is how we send signals. For example, when visiting a new restaurant, he suggests asking the waiter the simple question, “what is best?” If there is any hesitation, then maybe it’s not the restaurant for you.

In an ethnic restaurant, where there may be a cultural barrier to using this technique, he suggests some research may greatly improve your experience by _signal_ling you are an atypical, discriminating, serious customer. For example, in a Sichuan restaurant, he might request they “bring me the food of Chengdu.” Chicken kidneys with XO sauce will certainly be better prepared than the Kung Pao. As Michael Palin has said before, the local specialty is always the best choice.

More generally, when in a fancy (expen$ive) restaurant, order the ugly and unknown. The restaurant includes pedestrian foods (e.g. chicken fingers) for the diner unwilling to venture outside of their comfort zone. The menu is well thought out. If an unusual item is on the menu, it’s there for a reason, perhaps it’s a specialty.

Other sections are well worth reading. For example, he notes that long-term relationships always have a healthy dose of selective forgetfulness (“mental aggradation”); otherwise, people will dwell on the slightest slights.

A more economical example, pertinent for the holidays, is the overestimation of the utility of a “gym membership.” He cites a survey of 7,752 gym member spread among three health clubs and three years. Under one contract, a customer paying $70/month might attend once a week, or about $17 a visit. A ten-visit pass (at $10/visit) would be more economical, except because people are unwilling to confront their illusion about how much they will actually attend, they opt for the more expensive choice. Similarly, once they stop going, the average person will spend another 2 1/2 month before formally canceling membership.

Comments

Petersky
Bellevue

pedestrian choices on the menu

I am often slightly irritated when we go out some place really nice and my husband orders steak. The steak is on the menu for people like my husband, who views steak as a luxury item, something he doesn’t get enough of at home, and he doesn’t have to fear what is going to arrive.

Me, if I’m at a fancy restaurant, I want to try specialities of the house, even if what I feel like that particular night is a roasted hunk of animal flesh.

Laurel Fan
Seattle

hey, he stole my restaurant algorithm

My algorithm was “order the order the worst sounding thing” in the theory that it’s got to taste really good to overcome the initial disgust. Or at least make a good story.

Despite the stunning success in finding raw kibbe, natto (whatever, I like it), haggis, stir fried lettuce, etc, I have yet to take this to the logical conclusion and order the sheep uterus.

calypte
Edinburgh

hah at the gym!

I know exactly how much I’ve spent/visit, and how much cheaper it would have been to pay as I went. However, I figure the motivation of having the pass – even when it’s not working out – is better than the de-motivation of not spending the cash!


Jim Carson has received 5 cheers on this entry


FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | | Robot Co-op Blog | Copyright © 2004 - 2008 Robot Co-op