All Consuming


25 out of 31 people (80%) think this is worth consuming…


Smokin' Aces
by Joe Carnahan
See this at Amazon.com

67 people have consumed this.


See all 67 people who have consumed this

3 entries have been written about this.

DoctorTeeth
Edmonton

Smokin' Aces: A Flashy Mess — 1 year ago

NOT WORTH CONSUMING

The advertising campaign for Smokin’ Aces does everything right: flashy trailers, a poster that’s eye-catching and displays an impressive cast. I knew it wasn’t going to be a great movie, but I was confident that I would have fun with it. I did not.

I can’t speak for him, but I think that Joe Carnahan (Narc) was trying to make a contemporary, mature heist film. I mean, most of the elements are there: good ensemble cast, an object to be stolen (or in this case, person to be killed), and plenty of twists and turns. And he certainly injects the film with a lot of impressive influences and stylistic tics. Unfortunately, it’s as though he took all of this and put it in a blender, forgetting the two most important ingredients: a sense of humour, and a sense of direction. Instead of having a complex movie, we have a jumbled mess.

There are over a dozen “main” characters, and the movie does a decent job of introducing them and explaining the plot, but once that’s over, the movie stalls. The story’s confusing, with more than a few holes, but if you don’t care about the plot, then why should those matter? Interesting characters are underutilized: I was particularly impressed by Common’s performance, but he didn’t have enough to do. Other actors putting in good performances were Nestor Carbonell, Ray Liotta, and Ryan Reynolds, but the others ranged from adequate (Alicia Keys) to aggravating (Jeremy Piven) to confusing (Jason Bateman, although that has more to do with his character than his acting). The action scenes are good, but they didn’t rise much more above adequacy. And the twist at the end was partly telegraphed, partly out of nowhere, and entirely unsatisfying. Overall, Smokin’ Aces is unfunny and tries to make up for its aimlessness with well-choreographed fight scenes that sadly lack punch. If you’re a huge big action fan, maybe it’s worth a watch at the second-run theaters, or a dvd rental, but otherwise, I’d give it a pass.

petabyte
Chicago

Why I recommend this — 1 year ago

NOT WORTH CONSUMING

The only reason to see this Smokin’ Bad Movie.

calypte
Edinburgh

Smokin' Aces — 1 year ago

WORTH CONSUMING!

Hmm. First thing – it’s not funny. Nor is it a grim drama, just… hmm. “Bloody violence” screams the poster – yes, but nowhere near as bad as I thought, or as I’ve seen elsewhere.

It was… okay. Some good performances, a lot of faces to try and put name too. The convoluted plot is occasionally fun, although… something just didn’t gel into brilliance. The Ocean’s 11-style cut-screen cinematography adds a small style to the beginning, but is dropped quickly.

All in all, I thought it was fine popcorn-fare, but not too much else.


FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | | Robot Co-op Blog | Copyright © 2004 - 2008 Robot Co-op