Greg
Columbus
Wishy-washy — 2 years ago
I thought the premise was fascinating. What if we could place an implant in our brain that would take “snapshots” of our lives at random intervals and allow someone else (a ‘cutter’ in the film’s parlance) to edit the best bits together for our funerals (A “Rememory” is what they called the final film result).
Questions asked by the film about the nature of memory are good ones. Were things REALLY the way we remember them? Should we whitewash over the lives of people who are “human garbage” (in the words of one cutter) to craft a ‘nice’ life for them? Would the cutters be nearly God-like…since the devices (‘Zoe implants’) can capture anything..time spent in the bathroom…the bedroom..those moments we don’t want ANYone to know about.
- SPOILERS AHEAD
- SPOILERS AHEAD
- SPOILERS AHEAD
- SPOILERS AHEAD
I only can call it wishy-washy because in the end, the sub-plot involving people opposed to the devices’ use wasn’t clear. The leader of the opposition seeks the implant from a guy who died who was involved in the device’s creation who (I infer) may have been a child molester. But it’s not 100% clear WHY having the dirt on this guy out in public would end the use of the Zoe impants. The ending was a bit of a letdown.









