All Consuming


79 out of 104 people (75%) think this is worth consuming…

B0006a9fim

1 person is consuming this.

203 people have consumed this.


See all 203 people who have consumed this

People consuming this are also consuming these items.

2 entries have been written about this.

calypte
Edinburgh

A story about this — 1 year ago

Apparently this was originally meant as a Hugh Grant vehicle – ::shudder:: – I can’t imagine even the Briget Jones-era ‘bad boy’ Grant pulling off the underwear selection scene. Or any of the rest of it. Paul Bettany is the absolutely only thing worth watching in this movie. Why isn’t he in more films, really? Where was I? Oh yes. I imagine that if I actually liked tennis I’d’ve hated this movie, as it was… meh.

Rob Williams
Los Angeles

A story about this — 3 years ago

NOT WORTH CONSUMING

I would have to guess that the director of “Wimbledon” has never been to Wimbledon, has never watched Wimbledon on TV and has, in fact, never watched a tennis match before. Everything about the game play and the tournament rang false (a semi-final on a small, outside court???) and the shots were just bizarrely set up. Kirsten Dunst was horribly miscast, but Paul Bettany was light and refreshing—and more importantly, believable as a tennis player.


FAQ | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | | Robot Co-op Blog | Copyright © 2004 - 2008 Robot Co-op