I was most of the way through it, but then I realized I didn’t give a shit about the plot or any of the characters, so I stopped.

I wouldn’t have guessed that a movie of such emotional depth would have been made about Donkey Kong.

I’m not sure whether this book is brilliant or reactionary. Towards the end Kipnis asks, about Andrea Dworkin, “Is she making a political argument, or describing the eternal female condition?” The same question could be posed about her. It’s hard to tell which statements are meant as statements of eternal truths and which are meant to mock the conventional wisdom. When you think it’s meant one way, she’ll turn around and tell you it’s the other. Sometimes the mocking tone works, other times it comes off as watered-down David Foster Wallace.

Central 305.42 K57f 2006 DUE 12-06-07
Central 305.42 K57f 2006 DUE 12-06-07

Central Biography B-Tu846L 2006 AVAILABLE

Central 914.21 S616L 2002 AVAILABLE

Central 613.9071 L965w 2006 DUE 12-07-07

Central 200 D399b 2006 DUE 11-28-07
Central 200 D399b 2006 DUE 12-09-07

Central 591.562 B144b 1999 AVAILABLE
Fairview

Central 650.1087 G878m 2005 DUE 11-23-07
Central